IB Maths AI IA Criteria

This criterion assesses the use of appropriate mathematical language, notation, symbols, and terminology. It evaluates whether key terms and variables are defined, and if multiple appropriate forms of mathematical representation (formulae, diagrams, tables, graphs, models) are utilized. Logical proofs and deductive methods should be correctly set out where appropriate.

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student engages with the topic by exploring the mathematics and making it their own. Evidence of personal engagement includes thinking independently or creatively, presenting mathematical ideas uniquely, exploring from different perspectives, or making and testing predictions. Textbook-style reproductions without the candidate's own perspective will not achieve high levels.

This criterion assesses how the student reviews, analyses, and evaluates the exploration throughout the report. Meaningful reflection goes beyond simply describing results; it involves linking to aims, considering limitations, or comparing mathematical approaches. Critical reflection is deeply insightful, often addressing the impact of mathematical results on understanding the topic, discussing implications, or evaluating strengths and weaknesses.

This criterion assesses the extent to which students use relevant mathematics that is commensurate with the level of their course (SL or HL). Mathematics must support the exploration's aim; overly complicated math where simple math suffices is not rewarded. To achieve higher marks, students must clearly demonstrate their understanding through reasoning, evidence, or practical application, rather than just obtaining the correct answer.